Monday, January 26, 2015

Cold Snowy Day for a Global Warming Debate

Via comment by Anonymous on Greenpeace Activist Calls for Climate Change ‘Deni...

Stop sign covered in snow

It is a good day for global warming sceptics though the headlines read, “A Bad Day for Climate Change Deniers … And the Planet.” Climate change is defined by officials to mean global warming; and they insist it is warming even though we are cooling.

Time Magazine gets the climate change perversion prize, “Three new studies offer new proof of how bad the earth’s fever has gotten. It’s not often that the climate change deniers get clobbered three times in just two days. But that’s what happened with the release of a trio of new studies that ought to serve as solid body blows to the fading but persistent fiction that human-mediated warming is somehow a hoax. Good news for the forces of reason, however, is bad news for the planet—especially the oceans.”

What is perverse here is no mention of the real news for oceans, specifically the Northern Pacific Ocean, which is being polluted with radiation pouring out of Fukushima, is the greatest disaster to ever befall mankind. “Consensus holds that Fukushima constitutes the greatest radiological release into the ocean ever to occur.”

The Daily Mail responds with this headline, “NASA climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record… but we’re only 38% sure we were right.  The NASA climate scientists who claimed 2014 set a new record for global warmth last night admitted they were only 38% sure this was true. In a press release on Friday, NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) claimed its analysis of world temperatures showed ‘2014 was the warmest year on record’. The claim made headlines around the world, but yesterday it emerged that GISS’s analysis – based on readings from more than 3,000 measuring stations worldwide – is subject to a margin of error. Nasa admits this means it is far from certain that 2014 set a record at all.”

Robert Felix from Ice Age Now said, “Pay no attention to the real-world climate or those guys behind the curtain, we are told. Just worry about climate monsters conjured up by their computer models …. And you should turn a blind eye to the billions of dollars in government, industry and foundation money paid annually to researchers and modelers who subscribe to manmade climate disruption claims.”

As of the middle of January ice covered 88% of Lake Erie and 34.1% of the Great Lakes overall.

More @ Dr. Sircus

2 comments:

  1. I, personally, have no doubt the radiation is killing off the sea creatures like the
    massive bird deaths recently and the seals dying with sores on their bodies,
    star fish practically exterminated. If you ask an expert, scientist, they don't know.
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2015/01/150123-seabirds-mass-die-off-auklet-california-animals-environment/ This is happening over and over and is a warning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't know, but they may have not eaten enough because they were sick from the radiation poisoning, but then again, it is mentioned that it is only one species.

      Delete