Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Bergdahl's Dad - a historical analogy

Via Carl

http://blifetoday.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/obama-muslim12.jpg

 Folks,

Some questions I've received regarding Bowe Bergdahl's Dad center around his beard, praises to Allah and his social media "tweets" to get all Guantanamo detainees released. Some think I should give his Dad the benefit of the doubt that he may have used these tactics to protect his son. I couldn't disagree more.

I'll offer a historical analogy, and if anyone has any anecdotal evidence to the contrary, please post it. Now ponder this:

During Vietnam, did any parent of any American POW start speaking Vietnamese and don Vietcong attire so they could identify with their son's captures?

During WWII, did any parent of any American POW in Europe start speaking German while donning a brown shirt and swastika to identify with their son's captures? How about those parents of American POW's during the Bataan death march and all those held by the Japanese? Did they start speaking Japanese and don kimonos  while sporting Ninja gear to appease or identify with their son's captures?

And one final point - did Confederate women embrace a Massachusetts accent while trying to replace catfish with cod to identify with their husband and son's captures?

This may seem like a silly analogy, but it does bring into question the Muslim "habits" of Bergdahl's Dad, who at this point appears to be a co-conspirator.

Idaho is known for being anti-Federal with quite a few militia groups. Understandably so after Randy Weaver and Ruby Ridge. I share the same sentiment. However, it is one thing to question the government - another to join with the Muslim Mole and his brotherhood to kill Americans.

Again, it'll be interesting to see how this completely unfolds.

One thing is obvious - the Muslim Mole goes from one scandal to another. I reckon this is his plan of shutting down Gitmo - just let 'em all go and there'll be no reason to keep it open.

Semper Fi,

JW

2 comments:

  1. " just let 'em all go and there'll be no reason to keep it open..."

    Good idea that Soetoro started with the worst ones to set free, so why worry about the others?

    No matter whether Bergdohl and his son are now jihadi muslims, why did Obama want to get the younger one back here? Did they really believe in the WH that this would be viewed as a Big KUDO moment in the same way of the alleged (still no proof that ever really happened) assassination of OBL? Are they that insulated from reality? Did they really think that the truth about this collaborator wouldn't come out?

    What about the men who did come forward to blow the whistle on this Sham traitor despite the gag order they were forced to sign way back when they were still in Afghanistan? Have they suffered any repercussions yet? If they get messed with in any way, that could really do it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If they get messed with in any way, that could really do it.

      Let us hope the commies go way overboard and get the ball rolling.

      Delete