Wednesday, January 22, 2014

New trial sought for SC boy, 14, executed in 1944

Via Jeffery

FILE - This undated file photo provided by the South Carolina Department of Archives and History shows George Stinney Jr., the youngest person ever ex...

"Comment 1 minute ago
0 
1 
Wow! This story is still up, and the facts are still not being told. 24 March 1944: Betty June Binnicke, age 11, and Mary Emma Thames, age 7 of Alcolu, South Carolina, asked George Stinney and his sister Katherine where they might find some "maypops" an edible passionflower that grew wild. That was the last time they were seen alive. A search involving the entire town of mill workers ensued. The girls bodies were found in a muddy brook near the railroad tracks. They both had severe mortal injuries; openly fractured skulls.

George Stinney's OWN GRANDMOTHER turned him in to the police. He confessed to killing both girls and led detectives to the crime scene, he also uncovered the murder weapon, a railroad spike, that he had.

 *****************************

A 14-year-old black boy executed nearly 70 years ago is finally getting another day in court, and his lawyers plan to argue Tuesday for a new trial, saying his conviction was tainted by the segregationist-era justice system and scant evidence.

George Stinney was found guilty in 1944 of killing two white girls, ages 7 and 11. The trial lasted less than a day in the tiny Southern mill town of Alcolu, separated, as most were in those days, by race.

More @ Yahoo

8 comments:

  1. C'mon, he can't be guilty because racism!
    I liked Grump's comment from the article:

    '"Nearly all the evidence, including a confession that was central to the case against Stinney, has disappeared, along with the transcript of the trial. Lawyers working on behalf of Stinney's family have gathered new evidence, including sworn statements from his relatives accounting for his whereabouts the day the girls were killed and from a pathologist disputing the autopsy findings."

    So basically we're making stuff up now 70 years after the fact? Wanna' bet the conviction is overturned and the family gets some insanely huge payout from the state?'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So basically we're making stuff up now 70 years after the fact?

      Yup, guess he and his grandmother were lying...........

      Delete
  2. Who pays lawyers when teh client has been dead for 70 years? Is this another SPLC or ACLU shenanigan to give lawyers something to do when it's too cold outside to play golf? Who could benefit from "clearing his name"? He had no children. His parents are both dead.

    --Hale

    --Hale

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is this another SPLC or ACLU shenanigan

      Awww, the $PLC is guiltless, doncha' know........? :)

      Delete
  3. At this point, WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE!!

    Hilary

    My son, he be like dat.

    Obama

    ReplyDelete
  4. He din do nuthin. Was just getting ready to turn his life around.

    ReplyDelete