I don't even want to get started on the puh leece ...
I'm starting to regret the poor bastards survive the assassination attempts.
Tino
P.S. It would be in the grabbers interest to send someone to a proper training vis-a-vis firearms. They make themselves seem just silly with their photoes.
Any confirmation on whether these are authentic? I'd like to spread these around to show just how dumb the opposition is, but don't want to do if it's going to be discredited.
I realize they are this stupid, I just need proof that this particularly egregious case of stupidity is actually theirs.
All convicted rapists and child molesters deserve to die. And people like this who say otherwise deserve to be pistol whipped to death over the course of several days. Or put in a prison cell for 12 hours with a group of rapists. it's way past time to stop letting the enablers off the hook. And that goes for the political ones as well. if they actively promote leniency or removal of self defence, they are just as guilty in my book. Rehabilitate non violent offenders, execute violent ones. It would save a shit ton of money.
According to the California high court decision this past week you can't rape a single woman! Yes, they said that it's only rape if the woman is married.
Court Overturns Rape Conviction Because 1872 Law Says Unmarried Women Can’t Get Raped
"An 18-year-old woman who was raped by her brother’s friend, who pretended to be the victim’s own boyfriend, has had her rape conviction overturned by a California appeals court because of a 1872 law that says unmarried women are not legally protected from sexual assault by “impostors.”
As the UK’s Independent describes, Julio Morales sexually assaulted the sleeping victim in 2009 after she fell asleep alongside her boyfriend in a bed. The boyfriend then got up out of bed and left the apartment; Morales witnessed him leave. Later on that night, Morales entered the room and began raping the victim (while she was still asleep, as he was convicted of “rape of an unconscious person,” according to USA Today). During the rape, the victim thought Morales was her boyfriend — until light from outside the bedroom door revealed his face. The victim “pushed him away” and “began to cry and yell.”
Morales was convicted of sexual assault — as well he should have been. He clearly abused this sleeping woman’s consent. But the 2nd District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles has reversed the decision based on the 1872 law that only protected married ladies from “impostor” rape because the impostor would have been impersonating her husband — i.e. the only socially-sanctioned person with whom she could copulate. Back in Ye Olden Times, married women were considered naturally more virtuous than unmarried ones. You know those unmarried slutty slut sluts can’t be trusted to not have consensual sex with men and then change their minds later and say they thought he was someone else! Yup. Totally one of those things about being single.
The conviction was overturned on this minor technicality, based on a practically ancient law that does not adequately protect all women. This is the nineteenth century version of the “good victim” — you know, the victim who wasn’t drinking or wearing a short skirt while she was attacked. Nineteenth century rape law was more concerned with preserving the virtues of genteel married ladies than, you know, consent. Maybe legally it was the by-the-book, “correct” decision. But the law itself is offensive and wrong and must be changed immediately. And even the judges who overturned the conviction agree."
It really does not matter anymore if the posters are fake or not. The Brady bunch has never provided a single truthful fact to the gun control debate. They have lied and twisted the truth the best they'd.
It's scorched earth policy now when it comes to defending the Constitution and America. It's either them oor us. I prefer us.
The fact is that cops told this message to women some 15 - 20 years ago: do not fight, give up - let Obama's sons rape you.
Then Florida started to issue CCWs and cops training women. The rapes in Florida dropped some 80% instantly.
Beyond comprehension.
ReplyDeleteNobody can be this asinine, nobody - seriously.
I don't even want to get started on the puh leece ...
I'm starting to regret the poor bastards survive the assassination attempts.
Tino
P.S. It would be in the grabbers interest to send someone to a proper training vis-a-vis firearms. They make themselves seem just silly with their photoes.
I'm starting to regret the poor bastards survive the assassination attempts.
ReplyDeleteIt would be in the grabbers interest to send someone to a proper training vis-a-vis firearms. They make themselves seem just silly with their photoes.
Precisely.
Any confirmation on whether these are authentic? I'd like to spread these around to show just how dumb the opposition is, but don't want to do if it's going to be discredited.
ReplyDeleteI realize they are this stupid, I just need proof that this particularly egregious case of stupidity is actually theirs.
WIII
They're fakes. A guy over at arfcom did some snooping...4chan is the "creator".
Deletehttp://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1414864_Fake_Brady_Campaign_posters_.html
I posted a screen shot of the first one yesterday.
DeleteThanks 1911A1
DeleteAll convicted rapists and child molesters deserve to die. And people like this who say otherwise deserve to be pistol whipped to death over the course of several days. Or put in a prison cell for 12 hours with a group of rapists. it's way past time to stop letting the enablers off the hook. And that goes for the political ones as well. if they actively promote leniency or removal of self defence, they are just as guilty in my book. Rehabilitate non violent offenders, execute violent ones. It would save a shit ton of money.
ReplyDeleteGood thoughts.
DeleteAccording to the California high court decision this past week you can't rape a single woman! Yes, they said that it's only rape if the woman is married.
ReplyDeleteDo you have a link? Mind boggling.
Deletehttp://www.thefrisky.com/2013-01-05/court-overturns-rape-conviction-because-1872-law-says-unmarried-women-cant-get-raped/
DeleteCourt Overturns Rape Conviction Because 1872 Law Says Unmarried Women Can’t Get Raped
"An 18-year-old woman who was raped by her brother’s friend, who pretended to be the victim’s own boyfriend, has had her rape conviction overturned by a California appeals court because of a 1872 law that says unmarried women are not legally protected from sexual assault by “impostors.”
As the UK’s Independent describes, Julio Morales sexually assaulted the sleeping victim in 2009 after she fell asleep alongside her boyfriend in a bed. The boyfriend then got up out of bed and left the apartment; Morales witnessed him leave. Later on that night, Morales entered the room and began raping the victim (while she was still asleep, as he was convicted of “rape of an unconscious person,” according to USA Today). During the rape, the victim thought Morales was her boyfriend — until light from outside the bedroom door revealed his face. The victim “pushed him away” and “began to cry and yell.”
Morales was convicted of sexual assault — as well he should have been. He clearly abused this sleeping woman’s consent. But the 2nd District Court of Appeals in Los Angeles has reversed the decision based on the 1872 law that only protected married ladies from “impostor” rape because the impostor would have been impersonating her husband — i.e. the only socially-sanctioned person with whom she could copulate. Back in Ye Olden Times, married women were considered naturally more virtuous than unmarried ones. You know those unmarried slutty slut sluts can’t be trusted to not have consensual sex with men and then change their minds later and say they thought he was someone else! Yup. Totally one of those things about being single.
The conviction was overturned on this minor technicality, based on a practically ancient law that does not adequately protect all women. This is the nineteenth century version of the “good victim” — you know, the victim who wasn’t drinking or wearing a short skirt while she was attacked. Nineteenth century rape law was more concerned with preserving the virtues of genteel married ladies than, you know, consent. Maybe legally it was the by-the-book, “correct” decision. But the law itself is offensive and wrong and must be changed immediately. And even the judges who overturned the conviction agree."
Tino
Good piece and it certainly should.
DeleteIt really does not matter anymore if the posters are fake or not. The Brady bunch has never provided a single truthful fact to the gun control debate. They have lied and twisted the truth the best they'd.
ReplyDeleteIt's scorched earth policy now when it comes to defending the Constitution and America. It's either them oor us. I prefer us.
The fact is that cops told this message to women some 15 - 20 years ago: do not fight, give up - let Obama's sons rape you.
Then Florida started to issue CCWs and cops training women. The rapes in Florida dropped some 80% instantly.
FBHO and the Brady bunch!
Tino
It's scorched earth policy now when it comes to defending the Constitution and America. It's either them oor us. I prefer us.
DeleteAgreed.