Sunday, November 11, 2012

When the Optics no longer matter...


VERBATIM

I despise the word Optics as used by the kewl-kids inside the Beltway these days.  It simply means "The way things look to the public".  Politicians, by nature, worry about how every action will look to the public, especially those at home who will pull levers again next election.

But I warned immediately after the election that I am now willing to put a timeline on Implosion: Four years or fewer because the Bad People want to be in power to control the crash and to "re-build" America in their image.  Their image is a Red image.  Not Republican Red, but Communist Red.  The Bad People also know a massive reset is needed for either side to win.  For Liberty to truly die in America, there will have to be chaos to facilitate the coming Stalinist/Maoist purge.

I offered a simple metric for people to determine if my assessment was correct: Watch and see if those in power dismiss the Optics of their actions.  When they no longer care how it looks back home, it is because they do not plan for the folks back home to be relevant next election cycle.

Benghazi is proving to be an immediate affirmation that my assessment is correct.  At any other time in America, Benghazi would already be spoken of in terms of an Impeachable Offense.

In Washington when a political power struggle takes place, the victor almost always permits the vanquished to "resign" with some dignity in place.  But the crowd in power today did not permit Patreus to resign with dignity, "To spend more time with his family".  The crowd in power today is a bare-knuckle crew who play for keeps.  No, the victor in this power-play forced Patreus to eat it in public.  And he ate it.  (That he ate the infidelity and the utter iron-fisted nature of his dismissal tells me that they have more in their pocket on the guy, and this was still letting him off the hook a bit.)

The White House does not care that every single politician, bureaucrat and American who pays attention to politics understands that Patreus was kept online at the seat of CIA for political reasons, and once the potential political damage was mitigated (Obama won) they crushed him.  We all know he was sacked because he challenged the White House on Benghazi, he had damaging knowledge about Benghazi, and we all see the politics at play...and the players do not care that you know what they did and why they did it.  They want you to know that even the Director of CIA can be crushed with a whim. 

They do not care that you know they did it to bury the details of Benghazi.

The Secretary of State of the United States simply dismisses the House investigation and refuses to discuss Benghazi with them due to "scheduling conflicts".

Again, an absolute dismissal of the Optics, from a woman who has a legitimate shot at the Oval in 4 years.  And in less than a week from the election the brazen disregard for Optics is on full display, even by career politicians such as SoS Clinton.

Three major players have the details that could (and in any other time would) likely lead to rumbles of Impeachment for Benghazi: The White House, the State Department, and CIA.  (Some military folks surely have bits and pieces, but probably not all of the details in one place)

CIA is shut down.  State can't fit it into the schedule.  And the White House will never talk.  Noone in the military with knowledge will ever talk - not after watching what just happened to 4-Star Wonderkid Patreus who had his sights on 2016, and would have been a serious contender.

I am convinced that my original assessment was correct.  The clock is ticking.  Those in America who admire Stalin and Mao have a plan, and it will be executed without another meaningful Presidential Election. 

A genocidal purge is imminent, and those who intend to be Masters afterward no longer bother to care what the public may think.

When the pretense is dismissed, you'd better recognize...

Kerodin
III

18 comments:

  1. bear grylls messer
    My blog post ... bear grylls messer

    ReplyDelete
  2. 100 years from now, historians will scratch their head in bewilderment that within 3 decades of Reagan destroying the Soviet Union that the US was well on its way to being the very thing he destroyed and we celebrated - and that the US surrendered to an invasion by its neighbor to the south without ever firing a single shot of self defense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. well on its way to being the very thing he destroyed and we celebrated - and that the US surrendered to an invasion by its neighbor to the south without ever firing a single shot of self defense.

      Mind boggling.

      Delete
  3. Its funny that nobody likes committee decisions, but everybody defends voting like their life depends on it. Voting removes responsibility from decision making, its the ultimate committee decision. Some voting is good, voting for every damn position imaginable is bad. The founders knew this, and set up a government where representatives were chosen who then appointed people to other positions.

    The obvious benefit of this is instead of trying to study up on a hundred different candidates (who are all lying) to choose the best one for each position, you only ave to study up on a few that you trust to make good appointments.

    Check this piece from Bruce Charlton if you have time.

    http://www.charltonteaching.blogspot.com/2012/11/voting-fraud-censorship-group.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At the risk of having a conversation with myself, I want to add that politics should be kept as local as possible. The smallest group possible participating in as isolated a way as is practicable. I don't mean isolated from info, just from outside influence. For example, republicans in California should not have any say in the NC republican party platform. There should be no national parties, since there is only one national election, its just a way to consolidate power.

      Delete
    2. representatives were chosen who then appointed people to other positions.

      Absolutely and thanks for the link.

      Delete
    3. There should be no national parties, since there is only one national election, its just a way to consolidate power.

      Agreed.

      Delete
  4. Problem is, the rot and corruption runs local too. Around here the kingmakers have it all sown up and only their picks get elected. They're pretty untouchable legally too - things that'd see you and me in felony jail just don't seem to catch the prosecutor's eye.

    Daniel

    ReplyDelete
  5. Problem is, the rot and corruption runs local too. Around here the kingmakers have it all sown up and only their picks get elected. They're pretty untouchable legally too - things that'd see you and me in felony jail just don't seem to catch the prosecutor's eye.

    Daniel

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. things that'd see you and me in felony jail just don't seem to catch the prosecutor's eye.

      Infuriating.

      Delete
    2. We need a coordinated effort to take back county governments. Maybe not an official "party", but some people who are willing to commit resources and time to get good candidates elected. It needs to be statewide.

      Delete
    3. That's why Ron Paul pulled out of the race in '08 with $5 million left, so he could use it towards local offices. He was able to get quite a few elected this time.

      Delete
  6. My kingmaker comment above was referring to the county level. They've gotten very wealthy by keeping it local, local, local. The concept cuts both ways.

    Daniel

    ReplyDelete
  7. My kingmaker comment above was referring to the county level. They've gotten very wealthy by keeping it local, local, local. The concept cuts both ways.

    Daniel

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They've gotten very wealthy by keeping it local, local, local.

      I bet and for some reason your comments don't show up here, so I've been posting them from the email. Strange.

      Delete
    2. Beats me. I guess I should expect a Hellfire through the window any time now...

      Daniel

      Delete
  8. Beats me. I guess I should expect a Hellfire through the window any time now...

    Daniel

    ReplyDelete